By Danjuma Lamido
In a functioning democracy, the media plays an essential role in shaping public perception and ensuring accountability. However, when journalists or media outlets twist facts to suit a narrative, they betray that sacred duty.
Unfortunately, this is what Sahara Reporters has done once again, this time against the Nigeria Police Force.
On October 18, 2025, the Nigeria Police Force issued a press statement clarifying its position regarding the planned #FreeNnamdiKanuNow protest. Yet, Sahara Reporters chose to sensationalise the matter by falsely claiming that the police “threatened to arrest and deal ruthlessly with human rights activist Omoyele Sowore and other protesters found near the Presidential Villa on Monday, October 20.”
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The police statement never contained such inflammatory or threatening language. What the statement actually did was reaffirm the police’s constitutional duty to enforce the subsisting Order of the Federal High Court, Abuja Division, delivered on October 17, 2025, by Hon. Justice M.G. Umar in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2202/2025 — Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Omoyele Sowore & 4 Others.
The court order explicitly restrains any form of protest or procession around the Aso Rock Presidential Villa and its environs.
Therefore, the Nigeria Police merely reiterated that it will carry out the lawful order of the court, nothing more. Only those who choose to violate the subsisting court order by engaging in prohibited protests around restricted zones will be arrested and prosecuted in accordance with the law.
In fact, contrary to Sahara Reporters’ misleading insinuations, the police assured members of the public that adequate security measures are in place to protect law-abiding citizens and urged residents of the Federal Capital Territory to go about their normal activities without fear. This reassurance underscores the Force’s commitment to maintaining peace, not provoking unrest.
It is also worth emphasising that the Nigeria Police Force has consistently recognised and respected the rights of citizens to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression, fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
However, as with all rights, these must be exercised responsibly and within the bounds of the law, especially when issues of public safety, national security, and the rights of other citizens come into play.
The distortion of official communication by Sahara Reporters is not just unethical journalism; it is reckless. It fuels unnecessary tension and erodes public trust in critical national institutions. A responsible media outlet should verify information before publication, particularly when dealing with sensitive national security matters.
The police deserve commendation, not condemnation, for their balanced approach. By advising protesters and counter-protesters to avoid restricted areas, refrain from carrying weapons or engaging in provocative conduct, and channel their grievances through lawful means rather than through disruptive street demonstrations, the Force is promoting both peace and democracy.
Sahara Reporters and others in the media space must therefore remember that freedom of the press does not confer the licence to distort facts or incite disorder.
Nigeria’s democracy will thrive only when both law enforcement agencies and the media act responsibly and truthfully in the public interest.
Danjuma Lamido writes from Yola, Adamawa State. danjumalamido2011@gmail.com
